In critical thinking it is very crucial to collect the correct information to answer questions, so a reliable response can be given, but in some cases the information needed is not available. In cases like that, it only means we have to gather and examine the needed details to get to the precise information.

Now with the "Experimentation Activity" that me & my partner tested on is "The Toast Experiment" that we did during our Critical Thinking class...

Assessment #1

With the first toast that didn't exactly get toasted... This slice of bread was toasted with setting 2, in another case, the time wasn't enough for it to get toasted. It was still normal on the touch. (Not really toasted)

Assessment #2

With this slice of bread that was tested in setting 4 was good enough, but was still lacking the essence of being a toasted bread. Therefore it was only a bit rougher on the touch than the first one. (Too light)

Assessment #3

With finally the last slice of bread examined, it got a bit burnt on the edges or crusts with setting 6, but the middle part of the bread is perfectly toasted. (Just right)

This experiment was called an Induction because we had to test several bread until we reach into one result.

In conclusion? The slice of bread had raisins in them which means the raisins covers or blocks the heat's passage way into the bread. There are different types of breads and different brands of toasters that would make a difference in the setting options and toasting, too.